USP 797.org
  

 

  Articles on USP 797   

USP 797 Home
How to Achieve USP 797 Compliance

JCAHO Schedule for USP 797 Implementation

Articles on USP 797

USP 797 2008 Guidelines

Purchase USP 797 Products

USP 797 Vendors

Q&A on USP 797

Contact Us

Articles on USP 797 

Pharmacy Facts
By William N. Bernstein, AIA, ACHA
Architectural and environmental changes required for USP 797

Endorsed by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) with an aggressive compliance schedule, USP 797 has received great attention from hospital administrative, clinical and pharmacy staff.

However, its requirements also extend to architectural and environmental areas. Consequently, hospital design, construction and operations professionals should also become familiar with it.

Far-reaching regulation

USP 797 is a far-reaching regulation that governs a wide range of pharmacy policies and procedures. It is designed both to cut down on infections transmitted to patients through pharmaceutical products and to better protect staff working in pharmacies in the course of their exposure to pharmaceuticals.

Issued by U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP), the regulation governs any pharmacy that prepares "compounded sterile preparations" (CSPs). Many pharmacies fit this description. Moreover, many large hospitals have several pharmacies--a main one and several satellite pharmacies--that will be affected.

The schedule for compliance with USP 797 per JCAHO is as follows:

  • JCAHO began surveying for compliance with USP 797 on July 1, 2004;
  • JCAHO's deadline for an "Approved Facility Renovation Plan" (AFRP) is January 31, 2005; and
  • JCAHO's deadline for completion of construction called for in the AFRP is January 31, 2008.

First step in compliance

The first step in the process of compliance is to categorize a pharmacy into one of the following classifications: "Low-Risk Level CSP," "Medium-Risk Level CSP" or "High-Risk Level CSP."

A complete description of each level is outside the scope of this article. However, a general idea can be derived from examples excerpted from the USP 797 document, which can be purchased directly from USP through their Web site at www.usp.org.

These examples of low-risk compounding include the following:

  • "Single transfers of sterile dosage forms from ampuls, bottles, bags and vials using sterile syringes with sterile needles, other administration devices and other sterile containers ... "; and
  • "Manually measuring and mixing no more than three manufactured products to compound drug admixtures ... ."

Examples of medium-risk compounding include the following:

  • "Compounding of total parenteral nutrition fluids using manual or automated devices ... ";
  • "Filling of reservoirs of injection and infusion devices with multiple sterile drug products ... ";
  • "Filling of reservoirs of injection and infusion devices with volumes of sterile drug solutions ... "; and
  • "Transfer of volumes from multiple ampuls or vials into a single final sterile container or product."

Examples of high-risk compounding include the following:

  • "Dissolving nonsterile bulk drug and nutrient powders to make solutions which will be terminally sterilized.";
  • "Sterile ingredients, components, devices and mixtures are exposed to air quality inferior to ISO Class 5 ... ";
  • "Measuring and mixing sterile ingredients in nonsterile devices before sterilization is performed."; and
  • "Assuming, without appropriate evidence or direct determination, that packages of bulk ingredients contain at least 95 percent by weight of their active chemical moiety and have not been contaminated or adulterated between uses."

Overriding physical requirement

The overriding physical requirement of USP 797 is the creation of two zones: a "buffer room" (in general, where the sterile compounding is done) as well as an "anteroom" (in general, where nonsterile compounding activities occur, such as hand washing, storage and
measuring/weighing/mixing of nonsterile substances).

There is a critical difference, however, between the configuration of the buffer room and anteroom in a low-, medium- or high-risk environment. In a low- or medium-risk environment, the buffer room and anteroom can be in one shared room. In a high-risk environment, the buffer room and anteroom must be separated by a wall with a door.

USP 797 provides specific direction on the cleanliness or purity of the air in the buffer room. For a start, compounding of sterile substances must be done in a "Laminar Airflow Workbench" (LAFW), which must provide an air purity micro-environment of the International Organization for Standardization's ISO-5 (equivalent to a "Class 10" cleanroom). The ISO-5 LAFW, in turn, must be located in the buffer room, which must itself provide air quality equal to ISO-8 (equivalent to a "Class 100,000" cleanroom). To complicate matters, there is current discussion that the buffer room air purity level requirement may be raised to ISO-7 in the next version of the regulations.

USP 797 also provides detailed guidelines for architectural finishes in the buffer room. Only the minimum amount of furniture, equipment and supplies should be brought into the buffer room. All surfaces--ceiling, walls, floors, fixtures, shelving, counters and cabinets--should be "smooth, impervious, free from cracks and crevices, and nonshedding ... ." Junctures of ceilings to walls should be coved. Wall construction should be either a locked panel system or epoxy-coated gypsum board. Floors should be sheet vinyl with heat-welded seams and coved base. Exterior surfaces of lighting fixtures should be smooth, mounted flush and sealed. There should be no sinks or floor drains in this area, and work surfaces should ideally be stainless steel.

Cleaning and sanitizing

Another section of the guidelines concerns the cleaning and sanitizing of critical pharmacy areas, and refers to all compounding areas (low-, medium- and high-risk). Prescribed as the domain of trained pharmacists and technicians, cleaning and sanitizing should be done according to written procedures, and should be performed at the beginning of every shift.

The guidelines address the LAFW, buffer and anteroom separately. Within the LAFW, all items are to be removed, all surfaces cleaned of loose materials and residue from spills, and a residue-free sanitizing agent must be applied and left on for the time required to be effective.

In the buffer room, work surfaces are cleaned in a similar manner, storage shelving is to be emptied and sanitized weekly, and floors should be mopped daily when no aseptic operations are being performed.

In the anteroom, supplies and equipment removed from boxes should be wiped with a sanitizing agent. However, if the supplies arrive in pouches, they can be moved into the buffer room without sanitizing. External cartons must remain in the anteroom because they are prohibited from the buffer room.

In general, the anteroom is to be cleaned and sanitized by trained personnel at least once a week; however, floors must be cleaned and sanitized daily. Storage shelving must be emptied and cleaned and sanitized at regular intervals, but at least once a month.

Monitoring requirements

A final topic worth noting is a section on environmental monitoring. This monitoring entails the measurement of both the total number of particles and the number of viable microorganisms in the air of the compounding area.

To begin with, the LAFW must be tested at least once every six months (and/or every time the LAFW is relocated) to verify that the equipment meets the requirements of ISO Class 5 (or cleanroom "Class 10"). Beyond this, the air quality of the buffer room itself (the room containing the LAFW) must also be tested at least every six months (and/or whenever renovations occur) to confirm compliance with ISO Class 7 or ISO Class 8 (cleanroom "Class 10,000" or "Class 100,000").

On a fast track

The quick endorsement by JCAHO and equally quick implementation by JCAHO of a mandatory compliance schedule has forced hospitals to fast-track their evaluation and action plans.

Because of the complexity of the regulation, most administrators are opting to have an overall understanding of it, then setting up a team composed of themselves, an architect versed in USP 797, the chief pharmacist and the facility engineer. This team, in turn, is charged with coming up with a plan to meet JCAHO's looming compliance deadlines.

William N. Bernstein, AIA, ACHA, is a principal of the firm Bernstein & Associates Architects, New York City. Bernstein is currently involved in a number of USP 797 projects. He can be contacted at wb@bernarch.com.

This article 1st appeared in the July 2005 issue of Health Facilities Management Magazine.


What you will find on USP797.org : USP 797 regulations USP 797 vendors USP 797 products USP 797 articles USP 797 cleanrooms USP 797 barrier isolators USP 797 software
© 2005 USP 797.org / 59 West 19th St. : New York, NY  10011 : (212-463-0800) : info@usp797.org